Now Playing Tracks

kkaroushi:

peaceypanic:

minervasbiscuits:

peaceypanic:

fishmostly:

theaquablog:

moarrrmagazine:

so what do you think about this fishtank doghouse?

In theory this is cool, but why a dog house? No dog would want to sleep in there (there isn’t really any room to sleep?) and I can’t imagine the fish would be too thrilled with a dog disrupting them all the time.

Are those… discus?

My personal theory is that’s not a dog house. I think it’s a children’s crawl-through tunnel (it looks to me that it leads somewhere but I might be delusional) and the person who put down the “wipe your paws” mat thing has a sick of humor.

IDK but I’m pretty sure atleast 2 of my dogs would sit in it

It was made by the ‘Tanked’ crew for a vet’s office. While it’s a cute idea, they’re fucking shit heads. I don’t know how big of an issue it is since I don’t know the specific species they used, but they put amphibious ‘waterdogs’ in this tank, but gave them no terrestrial option.. I don’t really know enough about whatever species it was, but that seems like a bad idea.

I don’t think water dogs are as aquatic as a paddletail newts or axolotles.

What a fail, I knew it looked like a tanked tank :(

Reason #2738394892861 why the tanked guys are fucking morons.

Those Clown Loaches are going to reach up to 12” LONG. All loaches like dark hiding places, which you can see they don’t have.
It also looks like Discus, which are very expensive and VERY fragile fish that need VERY clean water to live in.
Waterdogs at least don’t need to come up on land, but they aren’t beginner species at all and, like the loaches, need a dark place to hide. The substrate is too large for an aquatic amphibian which may swallow it and become impacted.
Tanked’s aquariums are tacky and cruel.

steverogersisthecaptainofmypants:

intelligentmess:

facebooksexism:

mindofgemini:

Since it’s summer and this mindset begins to pop up more, let us clarify something.

Girls being upset over being seen in bra/panties but not bikinis is not a double standard.

If she’s in a bikini, it’s what she consciously chose to wear and be seen in, in a public space, and like any outfit she was prepared to be seen in it by other people.

If you’ve caught a girl in her underwear, however, you’re probably trespassing in her bedroom, bathroom, or other personal space, where she should be in privacy, and she has every right to be upset if that privacy is violated.

It’s not about what she’s wearing or what it is covering, but rather her privacy and consent to be seen in the first place. Please respect that.

Omg, amazing that someone thought to explain this

About time a cyclops set that porpoise straight

I HAVE ALWAYS SAID THIS!! A bikini is something you pick and are meant to be seen in public in, a bra and panties are private (unless, you know…) and ARE NOT MEANT TO BE ON DISPLAY!! (Unless, you know…)

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union